Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)
Jurnal IUS established December 2012, is an institution that focuses on journal development for post graduate students and all law activists in general and specialised topics. Journal IUS publishes three times a year and articles are based on research with specific themes.
Jurnal IUS was founded by a group of young lecturers who had a passion to spread their ideas, thoughts and expertise concerning law. Jurnal IUS focuses on publishing research about law reviews from law students, lecturers and other activists on various topics. As an academic centre, we organize regular discussions around various selected topics twice a month.
Topics of interest:
the battle of legal paradigm
legal pluralism
law and power
Articles
11 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB"
:
11 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[CRIMINAL LAW POLICY FOR THE ERADICATION OF MONEY LAUNDERING OFFENCES ]]>
<![CDATA[Ilman Mujadid]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (359.758 KB)
|
DOI: 10.12345/ius.v4i1.293
<![CDATA[Object of this study is to identify and analyze condemnation system and criminal responsibility for the perpetrator of money laundering crime. This research is normative research, that is research based on the study of policies and criminal sanctions on the Act No. 8 of 2010 regarding Countermeasure And Eradication Of Money Laundering. Approach of this study are statute approach and conceptual approach. Results of this study are: the condemnation system used in Act No. 8 of 2010 has different system with the general provisions in the Code of Criminal of Indonesia (KUHP) from the perspective of criminal punishment types (that are consist of death penalty, Prison, confinement, and imprisonment) and additional punishment in Indonesia Code of Criminal (KUHP) (that are consist of revocation of some rights, deprivation of some goods, and announcement judge’s decision). In Act No. 8 of 2010 there are two types of punishment, that are primary punishment (that are consist of prison and fines) and additional punishment (that are consist of announcement of judge’s decision, suspending part or all business activities of the Corporation, revocation of business licenses, dissolution and/or banning corporate, taking asset corporations for the State and / or, the takeover of the corporation for the State). This punishment shall apply only for the corporations. Form of condemnation system in Code of Criminal of Indonesia are general minimum and specific maximum. On the contrary form of condemnation system in Act No 8 of 2010 only specific maximum. For the application of punishment, Code of Criminal of Indonesia (KUHP) uses deterrence with which alternative characteristic, whereas Act No 8 of 2010 uses deterrence with which cumulative characteristic. Criminal responsibility system used in Act No. 8 of 2010 is responsibility based on the principle of fault which uses for persons (natural person), and for corporations (legal entity) uses corporate criminal responsibility system.Key Words : Condemnation system, criminal responsibility for money laundering offence.]]>
<![CDATA[THE APPLICATION OF THE LAW OF THE IMPOSITION OF THE BEA ACQUISITION OF RIGHTS TO LAND AND BUILDINGS (BPHTB) ]]>
<![CDATA[Marlon Gustia]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (346.495 KB)
|
DOI: 10.12345/ius.v4i1.294
<![CDATA[The research about tax, especially about acquisition tax of land and buildings (BHTP) very important because this is financing part from society to development our state This research tried to analyzing a few legal problems, such as: legal basis registration of lands, requirements and mechanisms BHTP based on Law of The Republic Indonesia Number 28 of 2009 concerning Local Taxation and Charges, BHTP collection policy for land registration in Central Lombok Regency This research used Normative method and empirical method namely: conceptual approach, statute approach, cases study, the results is land as part from the earth had social function, and its has potential investment for every person who have rights on land and building, they have duty to give economic value to their states through tax payment, in this case through imposition excise on acquired right on land and building (BPHTB) Keyword: Land Registration, BHTP tax]]>
<![CDATA[EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SERVICE CERTIFICATION FOR LAND (Larasita) IN WEST LOMBOK ]]>
<![CDATA[Jose Julian Syahral Haji]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.12345/ius.v4i1.297
<![CDATA[This study, namely : To Analyze the effectiveness of the People’s Service land certification (Larasita) in West Lombok regency, and To Analyze any constraints that may affect the effectiveness of the People for Land Certification Service (Larasita) in West Lombok regency. In conducting this study, the authors use empirical research methods, namely: Empirical Research which is one type of legal research that analyzes and examines the workings of society Based on the survey results revealed that: 1. In the implementation of the program Larasita in West Lombok district is not operating effectively, this happens because of a lack of competent human resources, dissemination to the public related to the Larasita the program as well as the means and facilities for pre inadequate. 2. In the implementation Larasita program has many constraints, among others: a. Limitations on rural communication network, b. The scarcity administer, c. Unavailability of information and communication technology devices on cars Larasita, and d. lack of public awareness of the program Larasita.Keywords: Effectiveness and Larasita]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 14/PUU-XI/2013 TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM SECARA SERENTAK ]]>
<![CDATA[Ashari ,SH]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (191.167 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29303/ius.v4i1.275
<![CDATA[Implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 14 / PUU-XI / 2013 on General Election In Unison. Law No. 8 Year 2011 concerning the Constitutional Court in Article 47 states that the Constitutional Court's decision had permanent legal power since completed pronounced a plenary session open to the public, so that the provisions of article that declared contrary to the 1945 Constitution as positive since the Constitutional Court decision was read, missing positive qualities as legal and can not be used as a basis for legitimate legal action. However, in order to enforce the law and justice for the people as holders of constitutional rights, the Constitutional Court is required to make breakthroughs law to be able to arrive in the idea that sometimes can not be reached by applicable law, as well as legal consequences in delaying the decision.Keywords: Constitutional Court, Effects,Simultaneous Election]]>
<![CDATA[NOTARY RESPONSIBILITY WHO HAS ENDED HIS TENURE ON NOTARY’S PROTOCOL AND DEED ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahda Budiansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (374.632 KB)
|
DOI: 10.12345/ius.v4i1.289
<![CDATA[Purpose of this research is to know responsibility in criminal and private law notary’s protocol and deed. This research use normative method thorough statute approach and conceptual approach. Liability in private law is based on wrongful act in accordance with Article 15 UUJN Jo Article 1365 Indonesia Civil Code (KUHPerdata) with the burden of proof to plaintiff to deed which get degradation from authentic deed to be unregistered deed base on wrongful act, compensation, and causality in action and tort between notary and injured party. While responsibility in criminal law base on wrongful law thorough there is intentional and negligence. Responsibility from criminal act, such as falsification of letter or document, is accordance with Article 263 and Article 264 KUHP and embezzlement if breaking Article 372, 374 KUHP or false information under oath accordance with Article 242 KUHP. Obligation for saving protocol and deed as a part of his obligation is accordance with Article 16 subsection (1) letter b and e UUJN Jo Article 63, 65 and article 63 subsection (5) UUJNKeyword: Responsibility, notary, protocol, and deed.]]>
<![CDATA[LEGAL ANALYSIS CONCERNING REDIRECTION OF THE OBJECT HIRE PURCHASE AGREEMENT ]]>
<![CDATA[Putut Sriyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (210.854 KB)
|
DOI: 10.12345/ius.v4i1.298
<![CDATA[Objects of this research are to know the regulations of hire purchase according to the Law of Indonesia and its implementation, along with legal implication of redirection of object agreement which conducted by debitor, and to know the problem solution if there is a default related to redirection of object by debitor. Type of this research is a normative legal research, that is done by examination of rules contained in legislation (in abstracto) and seek legal facts that occurred in the field (in concreto). Approach of this study are legislation approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Techniques and collection data of this research is primary data. The agreement of hire purchase is not regulated specifically in Indonesia Code Civil, but based on freedom of agreement. The implementation of hire purchase agreement conducted by PT Bahana Lestari Morindo Mataram made by non formal agreement. Legal consequence of redirection of object agreement to the third party is a default , give the rights to the seller of hire to sue compensation, cancel the agreement and to required a criminal charge. Legal problem caused by redirection of object hire purchase agreement shall be settle through non judicial settlement (nonlitigation) and judicial settlement in way of a civil claim and a criminal charge.Keywords: Redirection of Objects, hire purchase, legal implication]]>
<![CDATA[KONSEP HUKUM PERTAMBANGAN RAKYAT (STUDI DI KABUPATEN LOMBOK BARAT) ]]>
<![CDATA[Dwi Prilmilono]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Zuhairi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (190.554 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29303/ius.v4i1.421
<![CDATA[Judul Penelitian ini adalah konsep hukum pertambangan rakyat studi di Kabupaten Lombok Barat dengan jenis penelitian hukum normatif melakukan studi kepustakaan, dokumen, dan turunlapangan untuk melakukan wawancara sebagai data pelengkap. Pertambangan yang dilakukan oleh masyarakat sudah semakin mengancam lingkungan hidup dan mengandung potensi konflikhorizontal. Oleh karena itu judec factie pertambangan rakyat di Kabupaten Lombok Barat adalah untuk menghindari kerusakan lingkungan yang lebih besar, konflik vertical dan horizontalantara pemerintah dan masyarakat, dan tidak terjadi pemborosan bahan tambang, serta untukmeningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat setempat. Konsep hukum pertambangan rakyat yang berkelanjutan di Kabupaten Lombok Barat yaitu membuat kebijakan yang mengatur tahapanpertambangan rakyat mulai dari sosialisasi kepada masyarakat untuk menyebarkan informasi Tambang Rakyat, setelah itu Penetapan Wilayah Pertambangan Rakyat (WPR). Kemudian untuk mempermudah pengawasan maka yang berhak mengajukan izin pertambangan adalah perusahaan yang berbadan hukum Koperasi. Dari WPR yang ada, Dinas Pertambangan akan mengeluarkan Izin Pertambangan Rakyat (IPR) kepada Koperasi yang sudah memenuhi persyaratan formal. Sesudah Pengelolaan akan ada lembaga yang mengatur dan mengawasi tembang rakyat yang berjalan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-udangan yang berlaku. Untuk menghindari konflik maka ditetapkan mekanisme Kepemilikan wilayah IPR dan teknis penggalian agar terhindar dari konflik dengan pemilik wilayah IPR yang lain. Kemudian, pembuangan limbah yang akan langsung dipegang oleh perusahaan Semelter serta memperhatikan kesejahteraan masyarakat lingkartambang.]]>
<![CDATA[RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONVEYANCER AGAINST SELLING LAND DEED ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gusti Bagus Yoga Prawira]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (429.044 KB)
|
DOI: 10.12345/ius.v4i1.290
<![CDATA[Deed official Land Builders (PPAT) as the competent public authority to make the deeds of the land must have a special ability in the field of land so that the deed had made not to cause problems in the future given the deed he made could be used as evidence has the legal deed transfer of rights or cancellation of land rights. If the causes of the problems arise because of omissions by PPAT, then the deed resulted only have the force of law under the hand that can be cancelled due to nonfulfilment of the terms subjective. If the causes of the problems arise because of the dishonesty related client truth administrative requirements as the basis for certificates that can prove the certificates null and void due to nonfulfilment of objective requirements. Conclusion the results of the study are: 1. PPAT is a public official whose job is to make the deeds of certain particularly deed of transfer of rights over land as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 37, 1998, 2. PPAT was responsible for the deed he made either administrative, civil and criminal.Keyword : Land Deed Official ,The Deed Of Sale And Purchase Of Land]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PELAYARAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Pujiati Pujiati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (430.833 KB)
|
DOI: 10.12345/ius.v4i1.277
<![CDATA[This research aims to analyze the corporate criminal liability and criminal system toward the corporation that carry out the shipping criminal action based on Law No. 17 Year 2008 about Shipping. The type of this research is a normative juridical research with the consideration that this research departs from the analysis of the legislation. The methods used are legislation approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Legal materials collection techniques with the study of literature. Legal materials obtained were processed by analyzing use of reasoning logically and systematically with an interpretation of systematic, grammatical, telelogis and futuristic interpretation then be concluded by deductive.Based on the result of research concluded that corporate criminal liability and corporate criminal system toward shipping criminal action under Law No. 17 Year 2008 about Shipping in its implementation still many weakness, among others: when the corporation to be the actor; how corporation can be responsible; what types of sanctions that can be imposed for corporation; unregulated substitutes criminal fines are not paid by the corporation; unregulated the implementation guidelines on corporate criminal; unregulated separation between the offense and the crime; unregulated the terms of countermeasures the shipping criminal action. Based on the description, Law No. 17 Year 2008 about shipping for the future have to see the weaknesses mentioned above and should be amended. Keywords : Corporate Criminal Liability, Shipping Criminal Action]]>
<![CDATA[KARAKTERISTIK PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI ]]>
<![CDATA[Padil Padil]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (219.025 KB)
|
DOI: 10.12345/ius.v4i1.280
<![CDATA[Dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia, Korporasi adalah subjek hukum buatan yang dapat dikenakan pertanggungjawaban pidana sebagai subyek hukum (Rechtpersoon), korporasi bukan hanya diberi kewenangan untuk bertindak seperti individu, tetapi ditambah dengan kebebasan yang besar dalam menjalankan kegiatan ekonomi.Penelitian di lakukan dengan metode kuantitatif dan pendekatan normative dengan melihat ketentuan hukum pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi di Indonesia. Dalam penelitian ditemukan bahwa hukum positif di Indonesia mengatur hal yang berkaitan dengan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi yang relevan dengan kasus-kasus tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh korporasi, namun pada saat itu tidak mengatur pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi, oleh karena itu semua kasus yang menggunakan proses peradilan pidana didasarkan pada pertanggungjawaban perorangan yang pada umumnya adalah para pengurus atau pemegang saham atau orang yang memegang peran penting dalam beroperasinya korporasi tersebut, Dengan demikian konstruksi penyidikan dan penuntutan perkara, didasarkan pada perbuatan individu dan tidak berorientasi pada pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi itu sendiri, sehingga korporasi tidak di tuntut ataupun didakwa, padahal korporasi sudah dianggap mampu melakukan tindak pidana, maka semestinya harus dianggap mampu bertanggung jawab sebagaimana pertanggungjawaban orang perorangan, sehingga terlihat penarapan Undang-undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang pelakunya tidak saja orang namun juga korporasi, karena Undang-undang diluar KUHP mengakui manusia (naturlijk persoon) dan korporasi sebagai subjek delik. Kata Kunci : Karakteristik Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.]]>
